Weighted Moduli of Smoothness and Spline Spaces
β Scribed by Anna Kamont
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 215 KB
- Volume
- 98
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9045
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
In this paper we study relations between moduli of smoothness with the step-weight function . and the best approximation by splines with knots uniformly distributed according to the measure with density 1Γ.(x). The direct and converse results are obtained for a class of step-weight functions, containing .(x)= -x(1&x); it is well known that the modulus of smoothness corresponding to this . is related to the best polynomial approximation. As a consequence, we obtain relations between the best polynomial and spline approximations.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is shown that parametrical smoothness conditions are sufficient for modeling smooth spline surfaces of arbitrary topology if degenerate surface segments are accepted. In general, degeneracy, i.e., vanishing partial derivatives at extraordinary points, is leading to surfaces with geometrical singu
## Abstract This paper deals with function spaces of varying smoothness. It is a modified version of corresponding parts of [8]. Corresponding spaces of positive smoothness __s__ (__x__) will be considered in part II. We define the spaces __B__~__p__~ (β^__n__^ ), where the function π: __x__ β¦ __s
The best polynomial approximation is closely related to the DitzianαTotik modulus of smoothness. In 1988, Z. Ditzian and V. Totik gave some equivalences between them and the class of Besov-type spaces B p with 1 F p F Ο± and β£, s 1 F s F Ο±. We extend these equivalences to the similar Besov-type space
## Abstract We define a class of weighted Besov spaces and we obtain a characterization of this class by means of an appropriate class of weighted Lipschitz __Ο__ spaces. (Β© 2007 WILEYβVCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
We find conditions on the weight w in order to characterize functions in weighted Besov spaces BP,.,; in terms of differences d,f. Remark. Note that in the previous theorem one of the embeddings could have been proved under weaker assumptions. In fact, if 2