𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Weierstrass' Theorem in Weighted Sobolev Spaces

✍ Scribed by José M. Rodrı́guez

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
279 KB
Volume
108
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9045

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Weighted Sobolev Spaces on Curves
Weighted Sobolev Spaces on Curves
✍ Venancio Alvarez; Domingo Pestana; José M. Rodrı́guez; Elena Romera 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 359 KB
Nonstationary Stokes system in weighted
Nonstationary Stokes system in weighted Sobolev spaces
✍ Wojciech M. Zaja̧czkowski 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

We consider an initial-boundary value problem for nonstationary Stokes system in a bounded domain ⊂ R 3 with slip boundary conditions. We assume that is crossed by an axis L. Let us introduce the following weighted Sobolev spaces with finite norms: , where x) = dist{x, L}. We proved the result. Gi

The Helmholtz–Weyl decomposition in weig
The Helmholtz–Weyl decomposition in weighted Sobolev spaces
✍ Wojciech M. Zaja̧czkowski 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

## Communicated by M. Lachowicz Let f ∈ L 2,-l (R 3 ), where We prove the decomposition f =-∇u+g, with g divergence free and u is a solution to the problem in R 3 Since f, u, g are defined in R 3 we need a sufficiently fast decay of these functions as |x|→∞.

The finite Hilbert transform and weighte
The finite Hilbert transform and weighted Sobolev spaces
✍ David Elliott; Susumu Okada 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB

## Abstract The boundedness of the finite Hilbert transform operator on certain weighted __L~p~__ spaces is well known. We extend this result to give the boundedness of that operator on certain weighted Sobolev spaces. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Poincaré Inequality for Weighted First O
Poincaré Inequality for Weighted First Order Sobolev Spaces on Loop Spaces
✍ Fuzhou Gong; Michael Röckner; Wu Liming 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 268 KB

Taking lim sup L Ä lim k Ä in both sides of (2.10), by (i), (2.8), (2.9), and the fact that lim k Ä \* k =1 we get a contradiction. Hence, , is not identically zero.