𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Web Service Grids: an evolutionary approach

✍ Scribed by Malcolm Atkinson; David DeRoure; Alistair Dunlop; Geoffrey Fox; Peter Henderson; Tony Hey; Norman Paton; Steven Newhouse; Savas Parastatidis; Anne Trefethen; Paul Watson; Jim Webber


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
330 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
1532-0626

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The U.K. e‐Science Programme is a £250 million, five‐year initiative which has funded over 100 projects. These application‐led projects are underpinned by an emerging set of core middleware services that allow the coordinated, collaborative use of distributed resources. This set of middleware services runs on top of the research network and beneath the applications we call the ‘Grid’. Grid middleware is currently in transition from pre‐Web Service versions to a new version based on Web Services. Unfortunately, only a very basic set of Web Services embodied in the Web Services Interoperability proposal, WS‐I, are agreed by most IT companies. IBM and others have submitted proposals for Web Services for Grids—the Web Services ResourceFramework and Web Services Notification specifications—to the OASIS organization for standardization. This process could take up to 12 months from March 2004 and the specifications are subject to debate and potentially significant changes. Since several significant U.K. e‐Science projects come to an end before the end of this process, the U.K. needs to develop a strategy that will protect the U.K.'s investment in Grid middleware by informing the Open Middleware Infrastructure Institute's (OMII) roadmap and U.K. middleware repository in Southampton. This paper sets out an evolutionary roadmap that will allow us to capture generic middleware components from projects in a form that will facilitate migration or interoperability with the emerging Grid Web Services standards and with ongoing OGSA developments. In this paper we therefore define a set of Web Services specifications, which we call ‘WS‐I+’ to reflect the fact that this is a larger set than currently accepted by WS‐I, that we believe will enable us to achieve the twin goals of capturing these components and facilitating migration to future standards. We believe that the extra Web Services specifications we have included in WS‐I+ are both helpful in building e‐Science Grids and likely to be widely accepted. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Web services data analysis Grid
✍ William A. Watson III; Ian Bird; Jie Chen; Bryan Hess; Andy Kowalski; Ying Chen 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

## Abstract The trend in large‐scale scientific data analysis is to exploit computational, storage and other resources located at multiple sites, and to make those resources accessible to the scientist as if they were a single, coherent system. Web technologies driven by the huge and rapidly growin

An approach for quality of service adapt
✍ Rashid Al-Ali; Abdelhakim Hafid; Omer Rana; David Walker 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 181 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Some applications utilizing Grid computing infrastructure require the simultaneous allocation of resources, such as compute servers, networks, memory, disk storage and other specialized resources. Collaborative working and visualization is one example of such applications. In this conte

Special Issue: Grids and Web Services fo
✍ Tony Hey; Geoffrey Fox 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract This editorial describes four papers that summarize key Grid technology capabilities to support distributed e‐Science applications. These papers discuss the Condor system supporting computing communities, the OGSA‐DAI service interfaces for databases, the WS‐I+ Grid Service profile and