Waiting for a liver—Hidden costs of the organ shortage

✍ Scribed by Donald A. Brand; Deborah Viola; Pretam Rampersaud; Patricia A. Patrick; William S. Rosenthal; David C. Wolf

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2004
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 118 KB
• Volume: 10
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1527-6465
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.20212

✦ Synopsis

Discussion about the economics of end-stage liver disease has typically focused on the high cost of liver transplantation, but the management of complications in patients waiting for an organ can also be very expensive. Our research considered the hypothesis that an increase in the number of organ grafts would decrease health care costs in patients with liver disease by eliminating the cost of waiting for an organ. We examined treatment costs for a consecutive series of liver transplant candidates listed at our institution between November 1, 1996 and December 31, 1997. Costs were estimated for inpatient stays, outpatient visits, and posttransplant medications for 2 1/2 years from the date of listing. Of the 58 study patients, 26 (45%) received transplants, 7 of whom died within 2 1/2 years. A total of 11 patients (19%) died while waiting for an organ, and another 21 patients (36%) were still waiting after 2 1/2 years. Pretransplantation costs accounted for 41% of the total cost. Transplanting all 58 candidates without delay through a hypothetical increase in the supply of organs to meet demand would have more than doubled the number of transplantations while increasing costs in this cohort by only 37% (from $123,000 to $169,000 per patient). In conclusion, although an adequate supply of donor organs would not decrease total health care spending for patients with end-stage liver disease, so much money is currently spent on medical management during the waiting period that the savings achieved by transplanting all candidates without delay would offset a large portion of the cost of the additional transplants. (Liver