𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Von Wright's deontic logics

✍ Scribed by Harry S. Silverstein

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1974
Tongue
English
Weight
332 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-8116

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

On evaluating deontic logics
On evaluating deontic logics
✍ Harry beatty πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1972 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 324 KB
On deontic logic
On deontic logic
✍ Leon GumaΕ„ski πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1980 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 831 KB

Some requirements concerning deontic logic are formulated and discussed. Stress is laid on the need to distinguish between theories and deductive systems. It is argued that deontie theories need not be closed under the rule of de. tachment. Two deontie calculi, called DSC1, DSC~, are presented and t

Comments on Dr. Vetter's paper β€˜deontic
Comments on Dr. Vetter's paper β€˜deontic logic without deontic operators’
✍ Herbert Keuth πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1973 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 560 KB

DISCUSSION ## COMMENTS ON DR. VETTER'S PAPER 'DEONTIC LOGIC WITHOUT DEONTIC OPERATORS'\* 1. Vetter's paper contains interesting contributions to a still rather controversial subject: deontic logic. He proposes to substitute systems of deontic logic containing the operators 'permitted' and 'obliga

Semantics for more plausible deontic log
Semantics for more plausible deontic logics
✍ Sven Ove Hansson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 273 KB

In order to avoid the paradoxes of standard deontic logic, we have to give up the semantic construction that identifies obligatory status with presence in all elements of a subset of the set of possible worlds. It is proposed that deontic logic should instead be based on a preference relation, accor