๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Voluntary intoxication and criminal responsibility

โœ Scribed by Douglas B. Marlowe; Jennifer B. Lambert; Robert G. Thompson


Book ID
101281087
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
206 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0735-3936

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper reviews the law related to voluntary intoxication and criminal responsibility in the 50 United States, the District of Columbia, the US Virgin islands, and Puerto Rico. Statutory and case law citations are provided which govern the use of intoxication evidence in each jurisdiction to negate mens rea (i.e., to establish diminished capacity), to support an insanity defense, and to mitigate criminal sentencing. Factors that courts typically focus on when deciding whether to admit this evidence in a particular case are discussed, and these factors are related to clinically relevant criteria.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Craziness and criminal responsibility
โœ Stephen J. Morse ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 163 KB

This article addresses why mental disorder is relevant to criminal responsibility. It begins by considering the meaning of criminal responsibility because it is impossible to understand the relevance of mental disorder unless one understands responsibility clearly. The next section provides a theore

Drugs and Criminal Responsibility
โœ DAVID NAPLEY ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1968 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 479 KB
Character, purpose, and criminal respons
โœ Michael D. Bayles ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 810 KB

This paper explores analyzing criminal responsibility from the Humean position that blame is for character traits. If untoward acts indicate undesirable character traits, then the agent is blameworthy; if they do not, then the actor is not blameworthy -he has an excuse. A distinctive feature of this