Abstract
Purpose
To compare volume‐targeted and whole‐heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) after the administration of an intravascular contrast agent.
Materials and Methods
Six healthy adult subjects underwent a navigator‐gated and ‐corrected (NAV) free breathing volume‐targeted cardiac‐triggered inversion recovery (IR) 3D steady‐state free precession (SSFP) coronary MRA sequence (t‐CMRA) (spatial resolution = 1 × 1 × 3 mm^3^) and high spatial resolution IR 3D SSFP whole‐heart coronary MRA (WH‐CMRA) (spatial resolution = 1 × 1 × 2 mm^3^) after the administration of an intravascular contrast agent B‐22956. Subjective and objective image quality parameters including maximal visible vessel length, vessel sharpness, and visibility of coronary side branches were evaluated for both t‐CMRA and WH‐CMRA.
Results
No significant differences (P = NS) in image quality were observed between contrast‐enhanced t‐CMRA and WH‐CMRA. However, using an intravascular contrast agent, significantly longer vessel segments were measured on WH‐CMRA vs. t‐CMRA (right coronary artery [RCA] 13.5 ± 0.7 cm vs. 12.5 ± 0.2 cm; P < 0.05; and left circumflex coronary artery [LCX] 11.9 ± 2.2 cm vs. 6.9 ± 2.4 cm; P < 0.05). Significantly more side branches (13.3 ± 1.2 vs. 8.7 ± 1.2; P < 0.05) were visible for the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) on WH‐CMRA vs. t‐CMRA. Scanning time and navigator efficiency were similar for both techniques (t‐CMRA: 6.05 min; 49% vs. WH‐CMRA: 5.51 min; 54%, both P = NS).
Conclusion
Both WH‐CMRA and t‐CMRA using SSFP are useful techniques for coronary MRA after the injection of an intravascular blood‐pool agent. However, the vessel conspicuity for high spatial resolution WH‐CMRA is not inferior to t‐CMRA, while visible vessel length and the number of visible smaller‐diameter vessels and side‐branches are improved. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2009;30:1191–1196. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.