𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Voice profile after type I or II laser chordectomies for T1a glottic carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Elisabeth V. Sjögren; Maya A. van Rossum; Ton P. M. Langeveld; Marika S. Voerman; Vivienne A. H. van de Kamp; Robert J. Baatenburg de Jong


Book ID
102233141
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
336 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

Can a “typical” voice in terms of auditory perception be defined after type I or II chordectomy? Do other parameters in a multidimensional voice protocol correlate to this perceptual profile?

Methods

Voice evaluation using a multidimensional voice protocol including perceptual (GRBAS; grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain scale), acoustic, aerodynamic, stroboscopic analyses, and self‐assessment (Voice Handicap Index [VHI]) in a cohort of 37 consecutive patients with T1a midcord glottic carcinoma.

Results

Sixty‐five percent of patients had dysphonia, dominated by mild breathiness (mean grade 1.4). Voice Handicap was minimal (mean VHI 19). Acoustic and aerodynamic parameters were only mildly deviant. The correlations between perceptual analysis and the other parameters were weak.

Conclusion

The typical laser treated voice (type I or II resections) is characterized by mild breathiness in perceptual analysis. Correlations with other parameters, including patients' self assessment, are weak. Therefore, these outcomes do not form 1 integrated voice profile. This may have consequences for clinical decision‐making. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cordectomy by CO2 laser or radiotherapy
✍ Kim M. Goor; A. Jeanne G. E. Peeters; Hans F. Mahieu; Johannes A. Langendijk; C. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 136 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. The clinical results of radiotherapy and endoscopic cordectomy for T1a glottic carcinoma are reported to be similar, but costs of both treatments may differ. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the costs, voice quality, quality of life, and clinical results of both t