## Abstract Star chromatic number, introduced by A. Vince, is a natural generalization of chromatic number. We consider the question, βWhen is Ο\* < Ο?β We show that Ο\* < Ο if and only if a particular digraph is acyclic and that the decisioin problem associated with this question is probably not i
Vizing's coloring algorithm and the fan number
β Scribed by Diego Scheide; Michael Stiebitz
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 199 KB
- Volume
- 65
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0364-9024
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Most upper bounds for the chromatic index of a graph come from algorithms that produce edge colorings. One such algorithm was invented by Vizing [Diskret Analiz 3 (1964), 25β30] in 1964. Vizing's algorithm colors the edges of a graph one at a time and never uses more than Ξ+Β΅ colors, where Ξ is the maximum degree and Β΅ is the maximum multiplicity, respectively. In general, though, this upper bound of Ξ+Β΅ is rather generous. In this paper, we define a new parameter fan(G) in terms of the degrees and the multiplicities of G. We call fan(G) the fan number of G. First we show that the fan number can be computed by a polynomialβtime algorithm. Then we prove that the parameter Fan(G)=max{Ξ(G), fan(G)} is an upper bound for the chromatic index that can be realized by Vizing's coloring algorithm. Many of the known upper bounds for the chromatic index are also upper bounds for the fan number. Furthermore, we discuss the following question. What is the best (efficiently realizable) upper bound for the chromatic index in terms of Ξ and Β΅ ? Goldberg's Conjecture supports the conjecture that Οβ²+1 is the best efficiently realizable upper bound for Οβ² at all provided that Pβ NP. Β© 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 115β138, 2010
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
We prove m β€ βn -(β + 1)Ξ³ for every graph without isolated vertices of order n, size m, domination number Ξ³ and maximum degree β β₯ 3. This generalizes a result of Fisher et al., CU-Denver Tech Rep, 1996] who obtained the given bound for the case β = 3.
In fact, Vizing's proof implies an O(nm) time algorithm with β¬ Ο© 1 colors for the edge-coloring problem. However, Holyer has shown that deciding whether a graph requires β¬ or β¬ Ο© 1 colors is NP-complete [10]. For a multigraph G, Shannon showed that Π(G) Υ 3β¬/2 [16]. A number of parallel algorithms
## Abstract We prove that __m__ββ€βΞ (__n__βββΞ³~t~) for every graph each component of which has order at least 3 of order __n__, size __m__, total domination number Ξ³~t~, and maximum degree Ξββ₯β3. Β© 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 49: 285β290, 2005
## Abstract The proof of the main theorem in the paper [1] is incorrect as it is missing an important case. Here we complete the proof by giving the missing case. Β© 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 54: 350β353, 2007