β Scribed by Hock C. Chan
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
More and more relational database systems for microcomputers are providing visual interfaces, such as query by example (QBE). At the same time, experimental studies are providing more support for the theory that the end users can perform better with the entity relationship (ER) model than with the relational model, for both database design and retrieval tasks. In fact, there are already microcomputer systems for designing the database model based on entities and relationships. The logical development is for future systems to incorporate a visual retrieval module based on the entity relationship model. To provide guidelines for the design of these new interfaces, many proposed visual query languages (VQLs) are analysed and compared from the user's viewpoint. The analysed features include ER concepts, interaction modes, model diagram transformations, condition specification, aggregate functions, and output organisation. Different competing approaches adopted by the VQLs are highlighted. Empirical evidence on user's performance with VQLs are also examined. The survey results enable designers of future VQLs to build on existing techniques. It also identifies major approaches for human-factor researchers to empirically determine the best for users.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
In 1978 Bancilhon and Paredaens introduced a notion of completeness for relational database languages on instance-level. Their criterion was subsequently called BP-completeness. Since then, it was used frequently in the context of other database models. However, its application in the context of lan
Entity-relationship αextended entity-relationship models play a crucial role in the conceptual design of relational databases as well as object-oriented databases. Recently, several Ε½ . approaches have been proposed to enhance object-oriented databases OODBs using fuzzy set theory. In this paper, we
Multimedia data types, such as image and video, are structurally more complex than traditional data types. We view an image as a compound object containing many sub-objects. Each sub-object corresponds to image regions that are visually and semantically meaningful (e.g., car, man, etc.). In this pap