๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Verification and validation of Bayesian knowledge-bases

โœ Scribed by Eugene Santos Jr.


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
218 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0169-023X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Knowledge-base V&V primarily addresses the question: Does my knowledge-base contain the right answer and can I arrive at it?'' One of the main goals of our work is to properly encapsulate the knowledge representation and allow the expert to work with manageable-sized chunks of the knowledge-base. This work develops a new methodology for the veriยฎcation and validation of Bayesian knowledge-bases that assists in constructing and testing such knowledge-bases. Assistance takes the form of ensuring that the knowledge is syntactically correct, correcting imperfect'' knowledge, and also identifying when the current knowledge-base is insucient as well as suggesting ways to resolve this insuciency. The basis of our approach is the use of probabilistic network models of knowledge. This provides a framework for formally deยฎning and working on the problems of uncertainty in the knowledge-base.

In this paper, we examine the PESKI PESKI project which is concerned with assisting a human expert to build knowledgebased systems under uncertainty. We focus on how veriยฎcation and validation are currently achieved in PESKI PESKI. ร“ 2001 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


State-of-the-practice in knowledge-based
โœ David Hamilton; Keith Kelley; Chris Culbert ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 790 KB

The majority of the work in knowledge-based system verification and validation (KBS V& V) has focused on developing techniques and concepts for performing V& V on expert systems. Little information is available on what V& V practices are currently in use by expert system developers. This article des

Verification and correctness issues for
โœ Grigoris Antoniou ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 147 KB

Anomalies such as redundant, contradictory, or deficient knowledge in a knowledge base indicate possible errors. Various methods for detecting such anomalies have been introduced, analyzed, and applied in the past years, but they usually deal with rule-based systems. So far, little attention has bee