𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Verbal probabilities: a question of frame?

✍ Scribed by Karl Halvor Teigen; Wibecke Brun


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
140 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-3257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Verbal expressions of probability and uncertainty are of two kinds: positive (β€˜probable’, β€˜possible’) and negative (β€˜not certain’, β€˜doubtful’). Choice of term has implications for predictions and decisions. The present studies show that positive phrases are rated to be more optimistic (when the target outcome is positive), and more correct, when the target outcome actually occurs, even in cases where positive and negative phrases are perceived to convey the same probabilities (Experiments 1 and 2). Selection of phrase can be determined by linguistic frame. Positive quantifiers (β€˜some’, β€˜several’) support positive probability phrases, whereas negative quantifiers (β€˜not all’) suggest negative phrases (Experiment 3). Positive frames induced by numeric frequencies (e.g. the number of students to be admitted) imply positive probability phrases, whereas negative frames (e.g. the number of students to be rejected) call for negative probability phrases (Experiment 4). It is concluded that choice of verbal phrase is based not only on level of probability, but also on situational and linguistic cues. Copyright Β© 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


How probable is probable? A numerical tr
✍ Ruth Beyth-Marom πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1982 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 724 KB

## Abstract The reported experiment took place in a professional forecasting organization accustomed to giving verbal probability assessments (β€˜likely’, β€˜probable’, etc.). It attempts to highlight the communication problems caused by verbal probability expressions and to offer possible solutions th

Patterns of Preference for Numerical and
✍ MICHAEL J. OLSON; DAVID V. BUDESCU πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 240 KB

We report results of an experiment designed to test a principle formulated by Budescu and Wallsten (1995), that, when communicating uncertainty information, mode choices are sensitive to sources and degrees of vagueness. In addition, we examined subjects' ecacy in using such uncertainty information