✦ LIBER ✦

Verbal communication and noise in eating establishments

✍ Scribed by Jens Holger Rindel

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 374 KB
Volume: 71
Category: Article
ISSN: 0003-682X
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.07.005

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Prediction of verbal communication in no

Prediction of verbal communication in noise—A development of generalized SIL curves and the quality of communication (Part 2)

✍ H. Lazarus 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 910 KB

Unimpaired verbal communication is essential if the activity which brings the persons together is the verbal communication itself (e.g. conversations

Teacher-student verbal communication pat

Teacher-student verbal communication patterns in regular and special classrooms

✍ Raymond E. Webster; Melynda M. Johnson 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 406 KB

Perceived family cohesion, adaptability

Perceived family cohesion, adaptability and communication in eating disorders

✍ Vesna Vidović; Vesna Jureša; Ivan Begovac; Mirta Mahnik; Gorana Tocilj 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 91 KB

Environmental noise levels and noise red

Environmental noise levels and noise reduction in residential communities exposed to aircraft noise

✍ N. Moses; O. Zeitlin 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 134 KB

Interviews with ethnic interviewees: Non

Interviews with ethnic interviewees: Non-verbal communication errors in impression formation

✍ Aldert Vrij; August Dragt; Leendert Koppelaar 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 681 KB

Noise abatement in plant monocultures an

Noise abatement in plant monocultures and plant communities

✍ Maurice J.M Martens 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 945 KB

Three types of vegetation can be d&cerned with regard to the acoustic climate investigated in 4 different plantations, 2 plant communities, and a grass field, hi the first type of vegetation, i.e. beech and ashtree jorests, the excess attenuation was at least 10 dB/ lO0 m with the receiver at the sa