𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Variance preferences and variance shifts in group investment decisions

✍ Scribed by M. King Deets; George C. Hoyt


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1970
Weight
506 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0030-5073

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Explaining community-level variance in g
✍ Ziding Feng; Paula Diehr; Yutaka Yasui; Brent Evans; Shirley Beresford; Thomas D πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 122 KB

Between-community variance or community-by-time variance is one of the key factors driving the cost of conducting group randomized trials, which are often very expensive. We investigated empirically whether between-community variance could be reduced by controlling individual-and/or community-level

Eliciting and mapping qualitative prefer
✍ Ojelanki K Ngwenyama; Noel Bryson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 276 KB

Group work is becoming the norm in organizations. From strategy planning committees to quality management teams, organizational members are collaborating on problem solving. One area of team support that is often desired is the scoring and ranking of decision alternatives on qualitative/subjective d

Estimation and Prediction of Generalized
✍ Jack C. Lee; Ying-Lin Hsu πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 157 KB

In this paper we consider maximum likelihood analysis of generalized growth curve model with the Box-Cox transformation when the covariance matrix has AR(q) dependence structure with grouping variances. The covariance matrix under consideration is S = D s CD s where C is the correlation matrix with

Insolvency risk and its impact on the po
✍ Alexandra K Berketi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 587 KB

Ross and McWhirter (Ross and McWhirter, 1991. Unpublished paper) and Berketi and Macdonald (Berketi and Macdonald, 1999. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 24, 117-138) showed that diversifying insolvency risk results in a substantial cost to the policyholders in terms of reduction in their expec