๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Variance in randomized play-the-winner clinical trials

โœ Scribed by Peter C. Matthews; William F. Rosenberger


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
379 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0167-7152

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


PLAY THE WINNER FOR PHASE II/III CLINICA
โœ Q. YAO; L. J. WEI ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 642 KB

In comparing two treatments under a typical sequential clinical trial setting, a 50-50 randomization design generates reliable data for making efficient inferences about the treatment difference for the benefit of patients in the general population. However, if the treatment difference is large and

A comparison of the randomized play-the-
โœ D. S. Coad; William F. Rosenberger ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 91 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

We consider a clinical trial model comparing an experimental treatment with a control treatment when the responses are binary. For fixed significance level and power, we compare the expected number of treatment failures for two designsthe randomized play-the-winner rule and the triangular test. The

Explaining community-level variance in g
โœ Ziding Feng; Paula Diehr; Yutaka Yasui; Brent Evans; Shirley Beresford; Thomas D ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 122 KB

Between-community variance or community-by-time variance is one of the key factors driving the cost of conducting group randomized trials, which are often very expensive. We investigated empirically whether between-community variance could be reduced by controlling individual-and/or community-level