𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Value of the Danish prostate symptom score compared to the AUA symptom score and pressure/flow studies in the preoperative evaluation of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia

✍ Scribed by Jürgen Pannek; Richard R. Berges; Gerald Haupt; Theodor Senge


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
31 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0733-2467

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) is a new questionnaire for the assessment of lower tract urinary symptoms (LUTS), which claims to be able to predict bladder outlet obstruction. We evaluated the ability of the DAN-PSS to assess LUTS, to predict obstruction, and to predict treatment outcome in men with symptomatic uncomplicated BPH. Twenty-five consecutive men with symptomatic uncomplicated BPH filled in the AUA symptom score and the DAN-PSS and underwent uroflowmetry and pressure-flow studies prior to transurethral prostatic resection (TURP). Patients were reevaluated 4 days and 8 months after surgery. AUA score and DAN-PSS both assessed LUTS and were sensitive to symptom changes after therapy. Compared to pressure/flow studies, neither score correlated with bladder outlet obstruction. Peak urinary flow, however, correlated significantly with obstruction. None of the diagnostic tools used was able to improve patient selection for surgical treatment. The DAN-PSS is a valid and sensitive questionnaire for the assessment of LUTS. It is not able, however, to predict bladder outlet obstruction. In men with uncomplicated BPH, urodynamic evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction did not improve the subjective outcome of TURP.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comment on “Value of the Danish prostate
✍ Jesper Schou; Tage Hald; Jørgen Nordling 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 8 KB 👁 2 views

One of the conclusions of this paper is that the Danish Prostatic Symptom score is a valid and sensitive questionnaire for the assessment of LUTS. We fully agree and recommend this questionnaire instead of the IPSS score, because it is more sensitive to changes after treatment/intervention [Flyger e