๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Validity of the Terman-Merrill abbreviated version of the Stanford-Binet, form L-M

โœ Scribed by Robert Dodge; Thomas Palmer; Allan C. Yater


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
294 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The relative efficiency of abbreviated f
โœ Donald A. Gordon; Rex Forehand ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1972 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 159 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

persecution. Paranoid schizophrenic patient B tolerated the back approach poorly and during the first sessions when nearing the E she would generally turn around and present herself frontally and eye-to-eye. Horowitz(3) noted that a male acute paranoid appeared "frightened of real or hallucinated st

A comparison of the Stanford-Binet abbre
โœ Allan S. Bloom; Steven H. Klee; Larry M. Raskin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 339 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Three abbreviated versions of the Stanford-Binet were reviewed and compared for 50 chldren with developmental disabilities. The children ranged in age from 6 years -0 months to 15 years -11 months. While the IQs obtained from the abbreviated forms correlated highly with the com lete Binet I&, it was

The validity of certain subtests of the
โœ Philip J. Levinson; Robert L. Carpenter ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1975 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 300 KB

Certain subtests of the LVISC, ITPA, and Stanford-Binet are used as measures of analogical reasoning. Because several facts suggested t,hat the form of analogy used on these subtests does not require subjeck t.o engage in true analogical reasoning, t,he validity of these sub s as measures of analogi