𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Validity of the MMPI-2 basic and Harris–Lingoes subscales in a forensic sample

✍ Scribed by Timothy M. Osberg; Danielle L. Poland


Book ID
102307270
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
68 KB
Volume
57
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The present study explored the MMPI‐2 correlates of criminal history in a sample of prison inmates. Although Ma was the only basic scale to demonstrate a significant positive association to crime history, three Harris–Lingoes subscales also bore significant associations to this criterion. The Ma1 (amorality), Pd2 (authority problems), and Pd5 (self‐alienation) subscales demonstrated positive associations with crime history. Hierarchical multiple‐regression analyses were used to examine the incremental validity of the D, Pd, and Ma Harris–Lingoes subscales when added to their parent scales in the prediction of crime history. Only the Pd Harris–Lingoes subscales demonstrated incremental validity in the prediction of this criterion. The value of including the Ma and Pd Harris–Lingoes subscales in criminal risk assessment is discussed. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Psychol 57: 1369–1380, 2001.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The relation of the MMPI-2 Pd Harris-Lin
✍ Scott O. Lilienfeld 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 99 KB 👁 2 views

Little is known concerning the correlates of the MMPI-2 Psychopathic deviate (Pd) Harris-Lingoes subscales. In four studies with undergraduates, Pd2 (Authority Problems) emerged as the most consistent marker of psychopathy and antisocial behavior and was the only Pd subscale to assess the callousnes

Clinical utility of the MMPI-A content s
✍ Beverly A. Kopper; Augustine Osman; Joylene R. Osman; Joseph Hoffman 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB 👁 2 views

This study of 143 inpatient adolescents (68 boys and 75 girls) investigated the clinical utility of the MMPI-A in assessing suicidal risk factors by examining the unique contribution of the content scales and Harris-Lingoes subscales beyond what is provided by the basic clinical scales. The results