𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Validation of the modified telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS-m) in Hebrew

✍ Scribed by Michal Schnaider Beeri; Perla Werner; Michael Davidson; James Schmidler; Jeremy Silverman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
66 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Introduction

The validity of the Hebrew version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status‐Modified (TICS‐m) for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), for dementia, and for cognitive impairment (either MCI or dementia) was investigated.

Methods

Of the 10 059 who took part of the Israel Ischemic Heart Disease Cohort, 1902 of the 2901 survivors in 1999 had TICS‐m interviews. Those with a score of 27 or below and a random sample with a score of 28 or 29 were invited to have a physician's examination for the diagnosis of dementia. The analysis was performed on the 576 who agreed.

Results

Based on physician's diagnosis, 269 were diagnosed as suffering from dementia, 128 as suffering from MCI, and 179 were diagnosed with no cognitive impairment. The TICS‐m Hebrew version's internal consistency was very high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.98) and showed a strong convergent validity with the MMSE (r = 0.82; p < 0.0005). The sensitivity was 100% for each of the conditions. Finally, after controlling for age, education and hearing impairment, TICS‐m was a strong predictor of dementia, MCI and cognitive impairment.

Conclusion

At a cut‐off of 27/50 the Hebrew version of the TICS‐m is a useful screening instrument to identify subjects suffering from mild cognitive impairment, dementia and cognitive impairment (MCI or dementia). Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Validity of the Telephone Interview for
✍ Mark Barber; David J. Stott 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Cognitive impairment and dementia are very common after stroke. Telephone screening has potential advantages for clinical follow‐up and population‐based research in this group. We wished to test the validity of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) for cogni

Validation study of a French version of
✍ Marie-Noël Vercambre; Hélène Cuvelier; Yasemin Atakuman Gayon; Isabelle Hardy-Lé 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 162 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## Objective To evaluate the performance of a French version of the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (F‐TICS‐m) in identifying cognitive decline among elderly women. ## Methods All women aged 72–86 participating in the ‘Etude Epidémiologique auprès de Femmes de l'Edu

The Telephone Interview for Cognitive St
✍ David W. Desmond; Dr. Thomas K. Tatemichi; Leslie Hanzawa 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 467 KB 👁 1 views

The Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) is an 1 1-item screening test (maximum score = 41 points) that was developed for the assessment of cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease who are unwilling or unable to be examined in person. To investigate the 1-month test-retest

Use of an Italian version of the telepho
✍ Gloria Dal Forno; Paola Chiovenda; Federica Bressi; Florinda Ferreri; Enzo Gross 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB 👁 1 views

Objectives Validation of an Italian version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (I-TICS). Methods Telephone administration of the I-TICS within 6 weeks of face-to-face testing with the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), in Probable Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients and healthy control

Telephone interview for cognitive status
✍ Mark A. Espeland; Stephen R. Rapp; Jeff A. Katula; Lee Ann Andrews; Deborah Felt 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB 👁 1 views

Objective: To examine the performance of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) for identifying participants appropriate for trials of physical activity and cognitive training interventions. Methods: Volunteers (N ¼ 343), ages 70-85 years, who were being recruited for a pilot clinical t