This paper describes a computational model for analyzing arguments in discourse. In particular, the model describes processes necessary for interpreting one uninterrupted argument from a speaker. The resulting output is a representation for the underlying claim and evidence relations between proposi
β¦ LIBER β¦
Validation of a category system for arguments in conflict discourse
β Scribed by Manfred Hofer; Birgit Pikowsky
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 767 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0920-427X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A processing model for the analysis of o
β
Robin Cohen
π
Article
π
1990
π
Springer Netherlands
π
English
β 805 KB
Validation of a photobeam system for ass
β
R.E. Fitzgerald; M. Berres; U. Schaeppi
π
Article
π
1988
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 306 KB
The systems biology-based argument for t
The systems biology-based argument for taking a bold step in chemoprophylaxis of sickle vasculopathy
β
Robert P. Hebbel*
π
Article
π
2009
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 86 KB
π 1 views
SAWBONE AND IN VITRO VALIDATION OF A NOV
β
Howard Hillstrom; Mark Lenhoff; Timothy Carter; Grigory Syrkin; Andrew Kraszewsk
π
Article
π
2008
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 144 KB
In vivo validation of a therapy planning
β
Kai Siegfried Lehmann; Bernd Benedikt Frericks; Christoph Holmer; Andrea Schenk;
π
Article
π
2011
π
Springer
π
English
β 699 KB
Institutionalized knowledge conflict in
β
Matthijs HisschemΓΆller; Ries Bode
π
Article
π
2011
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 201 KB
This paper reports on a stakeholder dialogue project on the possible contribution of hydrogen to the Dutch energy transition. Dialogue methodology aims at articulating and exploring competing perspectives, including views that are in the margin of the energy policy subsystem. Three dialogue groups e