✦ LIBER ✦

Utility of Penman–Monteith, Priestley–Taylor, reference evapotranspiration, and pan evaporation methods to estimate pasture evapotranspiration

✍ Scribed by David M. Sumner; Jennifer M. Jacobs

Book ID: 116657871
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 1013 KB
Volume: 308
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-1694
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.10.023

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-5

Comparison of Priestley-Taylor and FAO-56 Penman-Monteith for Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation in Georgia

✍ Suleiman, Ayman A.; Hoogenboom, Gerrit 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 American Society of Civil Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 832 KB

A comparison of the Priestley-Taylor and

A comparison of the Priestley-Taylor and Penman methods for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration in tropical countries

✍ Gunston, H.; Batchelor, C.H. 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 612 KB

Sensitivity analysis of a Penman–Monteit

Sensitivity analysis of a Penman–Monteith type equation to estimate reference evapotranspiration in southern Spain

✍ Javier Estévez; Pedro Gavilán; Joaquín Berengena 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 658 KB

Sensitivity analysis is crucial in assessing the impact of climatic variables on reference evapotranspiration estimations. The sensitivity of the standardized ASCE-Penman-Monteith evapotranspiration equation for daily estimations to climatic variables has not yet been studied in Spain. Andalusia is

Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and al

Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada

✍ Paulo C. Sentelhas; Terry J. Gillespie; Eduardo A. Santos 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 766 KB