𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Use of physical restraints and antipsychotic medications in nursing homes: a cross-national study

✍ Scribed by Zhanlian Feng; John P. Hirdes; Trevor F. Smith; Harriet Finne-Soveri; Iris Chi; Jean-Noel Du Pasquier; Ruedi Gilgen; Naoki Ikegami; Vincent Mor


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
116 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Objectives

This study compares inter‐ and intra‐country differences in the prevalence of physical restraints and antipsychotic medications in nursing homes, and examines aggregated resident conditions and organizational characteristics correlated with these treatments.

Methods

Population‐based, cross‐sectional data were collected using a standardized Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) from 14,504 long‐term care facilities providing nursing home level services in five countries participating in the interRAI consortium, including Canada, Finland, Hong Kong (Special Administrative Region, China), Switzerland, and the United States. Facility‐level prevalence rates of physical restraints and antipsychotic use were examined both between and within the study countries.

Results

The prevalence of physical restraint use varied more than five‐fold across the study countries, from an average 6% in Switzerland, 9% in the US, 20% in Hong Kong, 28% in Finland, and over 31% in Canada. The prevalence of antipsychotic use ranged from 11% in Hong Kong, between 26–27% in Canada and the US, 34% in Switzerland, and nearly 38% in Finland. Within each country, substantial variations existed across facilities in both physical restraint and antipsychotic use rates. In all countries, neither facility case mix nor organizational characteristics were particularly predictive of the prevalence of either treatment.

Conclusions

There exists large, unexplained variability in the prevalence of physical restraint and antipsychotic use in nursing home facilities both between and within countries. Since restraints and antipsychotics are associated with adverse outcomes, it is important to understand the idiosyncratic factors specific to each country that contribute to variation in use rates. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


RESPONSE TO REGULATORY STRINGENCY: THE C
✍ John R. Bowblis; Stephen Crystal; Orna Intrator; Judith A. Lucas 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB 👁 1 views

## SUMMARY This paper studies the impact of regulatory stringency, as measured by the statewide deficiency citation rate over the past year, on the quality of care provided in a national sample of nursing homes from 2000 to 2005. The quality measure used is the proportion of residents who are using

Fifteen year comparison of antipsychotic
✍ Peter J. Connelly; Emma Law; Susan Angus; Neil Prentice 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 112 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective The use of antipsychotics to treat people with behavioural and psychological symptoms associated with dementia is controversial, especially in long‐stay settings. We assessed the relationship between behaviour, function and antipsychotic use in people with dementia in a lo

Evaluation of special and traditional de
✍ Siegfried Weyerer; Martina Schäufele; Ingrid Hendlmeier 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Objective Two‐thirds of all residents in nursing homes in Germany suffer from some type of dementia. We investigated whether or not dementia patients receiving special (segregated or partially segregated) care exhibited a better quality of life than their counterparts residing in tr