It is becoming standard practice in epidemiology to adjust relative risk estimates to remove the bias caused by non-di!erential errors in the exposure measurement. Estimation of the correction factor is often based on a validation study incorporating repeated measures of exposure, which are assumed
β¦ LIBER β¦
Use of biomarkers in epidemiologic studies: minimizing the influence of measurement error in the study design and analysis
β Scribed by Shelley S. Tworoger; Susan E. Hankinson
- Book ID
- 106382421
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 167 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0957-5243
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Measurement error in epidemiology: the d
β
M. Y. Wong; N. E. Day; S. A. Bashir; S. W. Duffy
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 124 KB
π 2 views
Measurement error in epidemiology: the d
β
M. Y. Wong; N. E. Day; N. J. Wareham
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 129 KB
π 2 views
The bias in relative risk estimates caused by errors in measurement of the relevant exposure is being increasingly recognized in epidemiology. Estimation of the necessary correction factor to remove this bias for univariate exposure has been considered in an earlier paper. We consider here the multi
The influence of radon measurement error
β
Zhukovsky, M.; Onishchenko, A.; Varaksin, A.; Vasilyev, A.
π
Article
π
2011
π
Oxford University Press
π
English
β 99 KB
The effect of exposure variance and expo
β
White, Emily; Kushiz, Lawrence H.; Pepe, Margaret S.
π
Article
π
1994
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 911 KB
The use of attributable fraction in the
β
ADAMS, M
π
Article
π
1989
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 468 KB
Design of studies for validation of biom
β
JΓΌrgen Wahrendorf
π
Article
π
1995
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 369 KB