We show that r(3, n) C(Z) -5 for n 2 13, and r(4, n)So(l') -1 for n 3 12.
Upper bounds for american futures options: A note
β Scribed by Mohammed M. Chaudhury; Jason Wei
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 264 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Under standard perfect market assumptions, the cost-of-carry formula can be applied to calculate the value of a pure (futures-style margining)
European futures option at time t with maturity at T [Duffie (1989, p. 285); Lieu (1990, p. 332)l:
where EC and EP are conventional European futures option prices for call and put, respectively, and are given by Black (1976) for lognormal futures prices. Pricing equations (1) and (2) apply to pure American call (PAC) and pure American put (PAP) options as well [Lieu (1990)I even if the interest rate is stochastic [Chen and Scott (1992)], since the pure European option price never falls below the intrinsic value of the option. Building on these pure options results and using rational pricing arguments [Merton ( 1 973)], new upper bounds for conventional American options are proposed in this note.
Thanks to two anonymous referees for valuable comments. The first author also acknowledges many helpful discussions with R. Chen.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A new and easily applicable method for estimating riskβneutral distributions (RND) implied by American futures options is proposed. It amounts to inverting the BaroneβAdesi and Whaley method (BAW method) to get the BAW implied volatility smile. Extensive empirical tests show that the BA
he recent introduction of options on agricultural futures has fueled a growing T research interest on issues ranging from risk-return characteristics of option hedging strategies to the valuation of commodity options. Valuation models for options on common stocks have been extensively used ever sinc