𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Upper bound for the number of independent sets in graphs

✍ Scribed by A. A. Sapozhenko


Book ID
111454379
Publisher
SP MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
175 KB
Volume
75
Category
Article
ISSN
1064-5624

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A new upper bound for the independence n
✍ Rong Luo; Yue Zhao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 107 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

In 1968, Vizing conjectured that if G is a -critical graph with n vertices, then (G) ≀ n / 2, where (G) is the independence number of G. In this paper, we apply Vizing and Vizing-like adjacency lemmas to this problem and prove that (G)<(((5 -6)n) / (8 -6))<5n / 8 if β‰₯ 6. α­§ 2010 Wiley

A sharp upper bound for the number of st
✍ Hongbo Hua πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 648 KB

Let G be a connected and simple graph, and let i(G) denote the number of stable sets in G. In this letter, we have presented a sharp upper bound for the i(G)-value among the set of graphs with k cut edges for all possible values of k, and characterized the corresponding extremal graphs as well.

An Upper Bound for the Independent Domin
✍ Liang Sun; Jianfang Wang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 87 KB

Let G be a simple graph of order n and minimum degree $. The independent domination number i(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. In this paper, we show that i(G) n+2$&2 -n$. Thus a conjecture of Favaron is settled in the affirmative.

The number of maximal independent sets i
✍ ZoltΓ‘n FΓΌredi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 286 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Generalizing a theorem of Moon and Moser. we determine the maximum number of maximal independent sets in a connected graph on n vertices for n sufficiently large, e.g., n > 50. = I .32. . .). Example 1.2. Let b, = i(C,), where C,z denotes the circuit of length n. Then b, = 3, 6, = 2, b, = 5, and b,