We give a non-trivial upper bound for F h ðg; NÞ, the size of a B h ½g subset of f1; . . . ; Ng, when g > 1. In particular, we prove F 2 ðg; NÞ41:864ðgNÞ 1=2 þ 1, and F h ðg; NÞ4 1 ð1þcos h ðp=hÞÞ 1=h ðhh!gNÞ 1=h , h > 2. On the other hand, we exhibit B 2 ½g subsets of f1; . . .
Upper and lower bounds for eigenvalues by finite difference methods
✍ Scribed by H. F. Weinberger
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1956
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 468 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0010-3640
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Verification of the computation of local quantities of interest, e.g. the displacements at a point, the stresses in a local area and the stress intensity factors at crack tips, plays an important role in improving the structural design for safety. In this paper, the smoothed finite elem
## Abstract The following article from __International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering__, Comments on ‘Upper bound solution to elasticity problems: A unique property of the linearly conforming point interpolation method (LC‐PIM)’ by G. R. Liu and G. Y. Zhang, published online on 19 Jun