๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate

โœ Scribed by Koenraad Elst


Publisher
Voice of India
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Leaves
515
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Revisionist discussion of Aryan invasion, early Indian history (1999)

This book on the developing arguments concerning the Aryan Invasion Theory consists of adapted versions of papers I have read: the first at the World Association of Vedic Studies (WAVES) conference on the Indus-Saraswati civilization in Atlanta 1996, the third at the 1996 Annual South Asia conference in Madison, Wisconsin and in a lecture at the Linguistics Department in Madison; the fifth contains material used in my paper read at the second WAVES conference in Los Angeles 1998; the second and fourth were read at lectures for the Belgo-Indian Association, Brussels, and at the Etnografisch Museum, Antwerp. Overlaps have been kept to a minimum. Here and there, sections of my book Indigenous Indians (Voice of India 1993, outdated as far as the fast-moving Aryan invasion debate is concerned) have been reused in adapted form.

Table of Contents:-
Preface
1. Political Aspects of the Aryan Invasion Debate
1.1. Politicizing a Linguistic Theory
1.2. The Aryan Invasion Theory in Indian Politics
1.3. Politicization as an Obstacle to Research
1.4. A Case Study in Ait Polemic
1.5. Some Red Herrings
1.6. Conclusion
2. Astronomic Data and the Aryan Question
2.1. Dating the Rg-Veda
2.2. Ancient Hindu Astronomy
2.3. The Precession of the Equinox
2.4. Additional Astronomical Indications
2.5. Conclusion
3. Linguistic Aspects of the Indo-European Urheimat Question
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Origin of the Linguistic Argument
3.3. Direct Geographical Clues
3.4. Exchanges With Other Language Families
3.5. Conclusion
4. Miscellaneous Aspects of the Aryan Invasion Debate
4.1. Demographical Common Sense
4.2. Textual Evidence
4.3. Where Did the Kurgan People Come From?
4.4. The Horse Evidence
4.5. Vedic Aryans in West Asia
4.6. Memory of the Urheimat
4.7. Indra and Shiva
4.8. Invasionist Terms in the Vedas
4.9. The Evidence From Physical Anthropology
5. Some New Arguments
5.1. A Remarkable Book
5.2. Evidence Provided by Physical Anthropology
5.3. The Archaeological Evidence
5.4. Linguistic Arguments
5.5. The Evidence From Comparative Religion
5.6. Conclusion
6. Departing Thoughts
6.1. Some False Problems
6.2. Things to Do
6.3. The Non-Invasionist Model
References

โœฆ Table of Contents


Preface
1. Political Aspects of the Aryan Invasion Debate
1.1. Politicizing a Linguistic Theory
1.2. The Aryan Invasion Theory in Indian Politics
1.3. Politicization as an Obstacle to Research
1.4. A Case Study in Ait Polemic
1.5. Some Red Herrings
1.6. Conclusion
2. Astronomic Data and the Aryan Question
2.1. Dating the Rg-Veda
2.2. Ancient Hindu Astronomy
2.3. The Precession of the Equinox
2.4. Additional Astronomical Indications
2.5. Conclusion
3. Linguistic Aspects of the Indo-European Urheimat Question
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Origin of the Linguistic Argument
3.3. Direct Geographical Clues
3.4. Exchanges With Other Language Families
3.5. Conclusion
4. Miscellaneous Aspects of the Aryan Invasion Debate
4.1. Demographical Common Sense
4.2. Textual Evidence
4.3. Where Did the Kurgan People Come From?
4.4. The Horse Evidence
4.5. Vedic Aryans in West Asia
4.6. Memory of the Urheimat
4.7. Indra and Shiva
4.8. Invasionist Terms in the Vedas
4.9. The Evidence From Physical Anthropology
5. Some New Arguments
5.1. A Remarkable Book
5.2. Evidence Provided by Physical Anthropology
5.3. The Archaeological Evidence
5.4. Linguistic Arguments
5.5. The Evidence From Comparative Religion
5.6. Conclusion
6. Departing Thoughts
6.1. Some False Problems
6.2. Things to Do
6.3. The Non-Invasionist Model
References

โœฆ Subjects


Aryan Invasion Theory


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate
โœ Koenraad Elst ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› Voice of India ๐ŸŒ English

Revisionist discussion of Aryan invasion, early Indian history (1999) This book on the developing arguments concerning the Aryan Invasion Theory consists of adapted versions of papers I have read: the first at the World Association of Vedic Studies (WAVES) conference on the Indus-Saraswati civili

Update on the Aryan Invasion Debate
โœ Elst K. ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐ŸŒ English

New Delhi: Aditya Prakashan, 1999. โ€” 342 pp. โ€” ISBN 81-86471-77-4.<div class="bb-sep"></div>The book discusses various aspects of the Indo-Aryan migration debate and concludes by proposing a chronological order for the events in the spread of Aryans Out of India.<br/>In the preface to the book, K. E

The Indo-Aryan Invasion Debate: The Logi
โœ Bryant E.F. ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐ŸŒ English

ะกั‚ะฐั‚ัŒั // Proceedings from the 10th Annual Indo-European Conference at UCLA. Monograph Series 32 โ€” 1998. โ€” Pp. 205-228.<div class="bb-sep"></div>The quest for the Indo-European homeland over the last two centuries has been almost exclusively a preoccupation of European scholars. However, this concer

A Brief Note on the Aryan Invasion Theor
โœ Danino M. ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐ŸŒ English

Article // PRAGATI Quarterly Research Journal. โ€” 2009. โ€” Vol. 3, Issue No.108 โ€” Pp. 5-20.<div class="bb-sep"></div>In the last two or three decades, the theory of an invasion of the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent by Aryans (sometimes called Indo-Aryans) around 1500 BCE, followed by the spread of their s

The Aryan Debate (Debates in Indian Hist
โœ Thomas R. Trautmann (editor) ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› OUP India ๐ŸŒ English

This book, the seventh in the Debates series, brings together a selection of significant essays on the extremely topical Aryan debate. The central question behind this selection is, did the Sanskrit-speaking Aryans enter India from the Northwest in 1500 BC, or were they indigenous to India and ident

The Horse and the Aryan Debate
โœ Danino M. ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐ŸŒ English

Article // Journal of Indian History and Culture. โ€” 2006. โ€” No.13 โ€” Pp. 33-59.<div class="bb-sep"></div>"The presence or absence of the horse in the Indus-Sarasvati civilization has been a bone of contention for decades, especially in the context of the Aryan invasion theory. The argument is familia