✦ LIBER ✦

Unravelling the effects of sequential presentation in culprit-present lineups

✍ Scribed by Amina Memon; Fiona Gabbert

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 116 KB
Volume: 17
Category: Article
ISSN: 0888-4080
DOI: 10.1002/acp.909

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Sequential effects in the presentation o

Sequential effects in the presentation of rorschach inkblots

✍ William E. Block 📂 Article 📅 1963 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 168 KB 👁 2 views

An unusual presentation of extramedullar

An unusual presentation of extramedullary plasmacytoma occurring sequentially in the testis, subcutaneous tissue, and heart

✍ L.A. Fernandez; S. Couban; R. Sy; R. Miller 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB 👁 2 views

The effects of matching locus of control

The effects of matching locus of control and presentation mode in parent training

✍ Susan Brewer; Nona Tollefson; Marvin J. Fine 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 474 KB 👁 1 views

The effect of moisture present in polyme

The effect of moisture present in polymers on their X-ray diffraction patterns

✍ B. R. Manjunath; A. Venkataraman; Thomas Stephen 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 480 KB

Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatos

Optic pathway gliomas in neurofibromatosis type 1: The effect of presenting symptoms on outcome

✍ King, Allison ;Listernick, Robert ;Charrow, Joel ;Piersall, Linda ;Gutmann, Davi 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB

Does Trial presentation medium matter in

Does Trial presentation medium matter in jury simulation research? Evaluating the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony

✍ Kathy Pezdek; Elizabeth Avila-Mora; Kathryn Sperry 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 122 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract This study assesses whether mock jurors' perceptions of eyewitness expert testimony vary based on the level of ecological validity—video or transcript trial presentation medium. In Experiment 1, 496 jury‐eligible mock jurors were presented a simulated trial. Each served in one condition