## Abstract magnified image Two new chromenone‐based __Schiff__‐base ligands, 3‐{[(1,5‐dihydro‐3‐methyl‐5‐thioxo‐4__H__‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐yl)imino]methyl}‐6‐hydroxy‐4__H__‐1‐benzopyran‐4‐one (**L**^**1**^) and 2,2′‐bis[(6‐hydroxy‐4‐oxo‐4__H__‐1‐benzopyran‐3‐yl)methylene]carbonothioic dihydrazide (**
Unique Ligand-Based Oxidative DNA Cleavage by Zinc(II) Complexes of Hpyramol and Hpyrimol
✍ Scribed by Palanisamy Uma Maheswari; Sharief Barends; Seniz Özalp-Yaman; Paul de Hoog; Hélène Casellas; Simon J. Teat; Chiara Massera; Martin Lutz; Anthony L. Spek; Gilles P. van Wezel; Patrick Gamez; Jan Reedijk
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 375 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0947-6539
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The zinc(II) complexes reported here have been synthesised from the ligand 4‐methyl‐2‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)aminophenol (Hpyramol) with chloride or acetate counterions. All the five complexes have been structurally characterised, and the crystal structures reveal that the ligand Hpyramol gradually undergoes an oxidative dehydrogenation to form the ligand 4‐methyl‐2‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethylene)aminophenol (Hpyrimol), upon coordination to Zn^II^. All the five complexes cleave the __ϕ__X174 phage DNA oxidatively and the complexes with fully dehydrogenated pyrimol ligands were found to be more efficient than the complexes with non‐dehydrogenated Hpyramol ligands. The DNA cleavage is suggested to be ligand‐based, whereas the pure ligands alone do not cleave DNA. The DNA cleavage is strongly suggested to be oxidative, possibly due to the involvement of a non‐diffusible phenoxyl radical mechanism. The enzymatic religation experiments and DNA cleavage in the presence of different radical scavengers further support the oxidative DNA cleavage by the zinc(II) complexes.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES