๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Union of logics modeled by finite trees

โœ Scribed by Ya. M. Drugush


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1982
Tongue
English
Weight
654 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0002-5232

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Computing finite models by reduction to
โœ Peter Baumgartner; Alexander Fuchs; Hans de Nivelle; Cesare Tinelli ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 215 KB

Recent years have seen considerable interest in procedures for computing finite models of first-order logic specifications. One of the major paradigms, MACE-style model building, is based on reducing model search to a sequence of propositional satisfiability problems and applying (efficient) SAT sol

Anatomical Variability and Functional Ab
โœ Wolfgang Schreiner; Friederike Neumann; Martin Neumann; Adelheid End; Susanne M. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 681 KB

The aim of this study was to investigate the extent that functional capability of vascular trees is related to anatomical variability. To these ends we used the method of Constrained Constructive Optimization (CCO) to generate optimized computer models of coronary arterial trees. All these model tre

Logical Complexity of Some Classes of Tr
โœ Wojciech Buszkowski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1980 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 515 KB

LOGICAL COMPLEXITY O F SOME CLASSES O F TREE LANGUAGES GENERATED BY MULTIPLE-TREE-AUTOMATA by WOJCIECH BUSZKOWSKI in Poznaii (Poland) 0. Introduction. Preliminary terminology and notation Multiple-tree-automata (MTAs) correspond to the kind of grammars called Lindenmayer systems with tables (cf. ROZ

On random models of finite power and mon
โœ Matt Kaufmann; Saharon Shelah ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 619 KB

For any property d~ of a model (or graph), let ~n(&) be the fraction of models of power n which satisfy &, and let ~(d~) = lim~\_\_~ Izn(d)) if this limit exists. For first-order properties &, it is known that ~(&) must be 0 or 1. We answer a question of K. Compton by proving in a strong way that th