## Abstract Forty participants were asked to commit a mock‐crime that involved them stealing a cell‐phone. Later the mock‐offenders were questioned and evidence was presented to them from a witness who was said to have seen the offence. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions i
Uniforms affect the accuracy of children's eyewitness identification decisions
✍ Scribed by Joseph A. Lowenstein; Hartmut Blank; James D. Sauer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 98 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1544-4759
- DOI
- 10.1002/jip.104
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A substantial proportion of line‐up identifications involving child eyewitnesses in the UK are conducted by police officers wearing uniform. This study examined the possibility that wearing a uniform constitutes an authority cue that adversely affects a child's ability to make accurate eyewitness identifications. Sixty participants aged 9–10 years old witnessed a staged crime and were later asked to identify a ‘burglar’ from a simultaneous line‐up using a 2 (uniform: present vs. absent) × 2 (target: present vs. absent) design. Children in the uniform present conditions made significantly more choices than children in the uniform absent conditions. More importantly, in the presence of a uniform, children made significantly more false identifications in target‐absent line‐ups. Analysis of supplementary, identification‐related variables (identification time and confidence, state anxiety) suggested that (1) the children experienced uncertainty if the target was absent from the line‐up, but (2) this uncertainty was not expressed when the line‐up administrator wore a uniform, leading to an increase in false identifications. Implications for line‐up administration procedures for children are discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES