Unification in Commutative Semigroups
β Scribed by Andrzej Kisielewicz
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 161 KB
- Volume
- 200
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-8693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Unification is one of the basic concepts of automated theorem proving. It concerns such questions as finding solutions of finite sets of equations, determining if every solution comes from a most general solution, and if so, determining how many most general solutions are needed to generate all solutions. These solutions given in terms of substitutions are called, more formally, unifiers. The unification Ε½ . type of a variery equational class of algebras is defined according to the cardinality or existence of minimal complete sets of most general unifiers. Of particular interest, from a computational point of view, are varieties of groups and semigroups. So far the problem has been considered mainly for particular varieties. In this paper we determine unification types for all varieties of commutative semigroups. In particular, we prove that for commutative semigroups the unification problem is solvable in the very strong sense that there is an algorithm which for any two finite sets βΊ and βΊ of semigroup equations produces the minimal 1 2 complete set of the most general unifiers of βΊ over the variety of commutative 1 semigroups generated by βΊ . It seems that this is the first so general decidability 2 result in the area.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Commutative Kleene semigroups are known to be rational, but Pelletier constructed a nonrational weakly commutative Kleene semigroup. We introduce slightly commutative Kleene semigroups, a class of weakly commutative Kleene semigroups, and prove that every slightly commutative Kleene semigroup is rat
Ξ± -r e 2 s at , and bt β₯ Ξ± 2i-r e 2 Ξ± -r e 2 s at . Since Ξ± r e 1 a β₯ e 1 at, there exists v β S such that at = Ξ± r e 1 av. Then e 1 sat . We can prove similarly the other inequations. Thus it follows from the equations above and Lemma 7(ii) that Ξ± 2i-r Ξ± -r e 2 s at = Ξ± 2i-r f 2 Ξ± -r f 2 s at . T