๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Underuse of colorectal cancer screening in a cohort of medicare beneficiaries

โœ Scribed by Gregory S. Cooper; Tzuyung Doug Kou


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
88 KB
Volume
112
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND.

To the authors' knowledge, few populationโ€based studies to date have considered the serial use of colorectal cancer screening tests, which are usually recommended at specific intervals.

METHODS.

The study included a cohort of cancerโ€free Medicare beneficiaries aged โ‰ฅ70 years who were identified in 1998. Inpatient, physician, and outpatient Medicare claims for colorectal screening procedures from 1991 through 1997 and 1998 through 2004 were used to categorize patients as receiving previous and subsequent complete screening, respectively. Codes were also used to identify patients at increased neoplasia risk. Cox proportional hazards models were used to measure time to receipt of complete screening in followโ€up.

RESULTS.

The cohort consisted of 153,469 Medicare beneficiaries. Previous complete screening was performed in 29.2% of the cohort, including 76.7% of the increased risk group and 22.9% of other patients (P < .001). In the entire study cohort, the criteria for complete screening during the followโ€up period were met in only 25.4% of patients, and included colonoscopy (17.6%), flexible sigmoidoscopy (2.9%), yearly fecal occult blood testing (0.8%), barium enema (0.1%), and >1 method (4.1%). Subsequent screening was strongly associated with receipt of previous screening (35.7% vs 21.2% of others; P < .001), and was also more frequent in younger and white patients. The differences were maintained in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS.

In a populationโ€based cohort of Medicare beneficiaries, despite insurance reimbursement, there is significant underuse of colorectal testing. Given the ability of screening tests to reduce cancer incidence and mortality, continued efforts to promote screening are clearly warranted. Cancer 2008. ยฉ 2007 American Cancer Society.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Racial disparities in the use of and ind
โœ Gregory S. Cooper; Siran M. Koroukian ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 81 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND African Americans are diagnosed more frequently with colorectal carcinoma at a later stage compared with Caucasians. One potential reason for the disparity is a lower rate of screening examinations. ## METHODS Using Outpatient and Physicianโ€Supplier claims for all Medic

Colorectal cancer screening: A compariso
โœ Victoria S. Benson; Julietta Patnick; Anna K. Davies; Marion R. Nadel; Robert A. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 103 KB

## Abstract Although in its infancy, organized screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in the general population is increasing at regional and national levels. Documenting and describing these initiatives is critical to identifying, sharing and promoting best practice in the delivery of CRC screening