✦ LIBER ✦

Understanding the impact of economic evidence on clinical decision making: A discrete choice experiment in cardiology

✍ Scribed by Aleksandra Torbica; Giovanni Fattore

Book ID: 113908545
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2010
Tongue: English
Weight: 166 KB
Volume: 70
Category: Article
ISSN: 0277-9536
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.030

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The use of discrete choice models in the

The use of discrete choice models in the determination of community choices in public issue areas impacting on business decision making

✍ David A. Hensher 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 778 KB

The use of discrete choice models in the

The use of discrete choice models in the determination of community choices in public issue areas impacting on business decision making

✍ David A. Hensher 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 757 KB

The impact of patient age on clinical de

The impact of patient age on clinical decision-making in oncology

✍ Rule, J.; Birtwistle, M.; Day, R.; Holding, J.; Matarredona, A.; Zeiderman, M.; 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 68 KB

Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete ch

Dynamic hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments: Evidence from measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility on consumers demand

✍ Araña, Jorge E.; León, Carmelo J. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 664 KB

A Study of the Impact of Medical Librari

A Study of the Impact of Medical Libraries on Clinical Decision-Making in Nigeria University Teaching Hospitals

✍ A.A. ODUWOLE 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

The impact of four conferencing formats

The impact of four conferencing formats on the efficiency and quality of small group decision making in a laboratory experiment setting

✍ Gary P Radford; Barry F Morganstern; Charles W McMickle; Jennifer K Lehr 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 945 KB

This study reports the results of a laboratory experiment which compares the efficiency and quality of small group decision making in four conferencing and teleconferencing formats. 204 subjects randomly assigned to 51 small decision making groups were asked to reach a group consensus on an informat