Understanding the “cognitive revolution” in psychology
✍ Scribed by John D. Greenwood
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 168 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-5061
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In this paper it is argued that the "cognitive revolution" in psychology is not best represented either as a Kuhnian "paradigm shift," or as a movement from an instrumentalist to a realist conception of psychological theory, or as a continuous evolution out of more "liberalized" forms of behaviorism, or as a return to the form of "structuralist" psychology practiced by Wundt and Titchener. It is suggested that the move from behaviorism to cognitivism is best represented in terms of the replacement of (operationally defined) "intervening variables" by genuine "hypothetical constructs" possessing cognitive "surplus meaning," and that the "cognitive revolution" of the 1950s continued a cognitive tradition that can be traced back to the 1920s.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
This work is nothing less than a comprehensive reinterpretation of the transformation of higher education in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Julie A. Reuben takes as her focus the fracturing of the nineteenth-century faith in the unity of truth by a series of developments that ult
The Study of Monsters in Sixteenth-Century France and England" (1981). Since then, the scholarly world has been awaiting the booklength version. What we have finally got is a work somewhat different from what has been widely expected. "Monsters", as such, do not figure in the title and occupy only
## Summary Drawing on psychological science, magic provides a unique perspective on applied cognition. Only sparse systematic research, however, documents the thought processes associated with viewing magic tricks. With responses from over 1000 participants, here, we show how individuals construe a
This article describes how established research methods in cognitive psychology can be applied to answer questions about the ability of systems thinking interventions to improve the nature and quality of thought about complex systems. The need for and advantages of controlled experimental research o