𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Understanding cost-effectiveness

✍ Scribed by M. D. Zilberberg; A. F. Shorr

Book ID
111110275
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
53 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1198-743X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Costs in perspective: Understanding cost
Costs in perspective: Understanding cost-effectiveness analysis
✍ Allan S. Detsky πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Springer US 🌐 English βš– 483 KB

This paper covers five questions: (1) What is costeffectiveness analysis? (2) How can cost-effectiveness analysis help policymakers allocate scarce resources? (3) What are misconceptions about the cost effectiveness of health care interventions? (4) What is an attractive cost-effectiveness ratio? (5

Cost-effectiveness counts
Cost-effectiveness counts
✍ Alan E. Comyns πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Elsevier Science βš– 60 KB
Cost-Effectiveness Studies
Cost-Effectiveness Studies
✍ Chaiyakunapruk, N ;Saokaew, S ;Pansang, S πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 687 KB
Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis wit
Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis with two measures of effectiveness: the cost-effectiveness acceptability plane
✍ Miguel A. NegrΓ­n; Francisco J. VΓ‘zquez-Polo πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 263 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) compares the costs and outcomes of two or more technologies. However, there is no consensus about which measure of effectiveness should be used in each analysis. Clinical researchers have to select an appropriate outcome for their purpose, and this choice can have d

Affordability and cost-effectiveness: de
Affordability and cost-effectiveness: decision-making on the cost-effectiveness plane
✍ P. Pedram Sendi; Andrew H. Briggs πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 206 KB

## Abstract Much recent research interest has focused on handling uncertainty in cost‐effectiveness analysis and in particular the calculation of confidence intervals for incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Problems of interpretation when ICERs are negative have led to two important and