𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Uncertainty in the economic evaluation of health care technologies: The role of sensitivity analysis

✍ Scribed by Andrew Briggs; Mark Sculpher; Martin Buxton


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
945 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
1057-9230

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Discounting and decision making in the e
✍ Karl Claxton; Mike Paulden; Hugh Gravelle; Werner Brouwer; Anthony J. Culyer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 150 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Discounting costs and health benefits in cost-effectiveness analysis has been the subject of recent debate -some authors suggesting a common rate for both and others suggesting a lower rate for health. We show how these views turn on key judgments of fact and value: on whether the social objective i

Economic evaluation and the postponement
✍ Pieter H. M. van Baal; Talitha L. Feenstra; Johan J. Polder; Rudolf T. Hoogenvee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 156 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The inclusion of medical costs in life years gained in economic evaluations of health care technologies has long been controversial. Arguments in favour of the inclusion of such costs are gaining support, which shifts the question from whether to how to include these costs. This paper elaborates on

Estimating production costs in the econo
✍ Carmen Herrero; Juan D. Moreno-Ternero πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 160 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

## Abstract We propose a method for calculating the production costs of an intervention in a manner that accounts for differences in productive β€˜effort.’ This method could be used within a cost‐effectiveness analysis framework in the evaluation of new medical technologies, pharmaceuticals, treatmen

Health care economics of cancer in the e
✍ Joseph S. Bailes πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 84 KB πŸ‘ 3 views

Changing economic circumstances have brought increased pressure to bear on the traditional revenue sources of oncologists. Practice standards and settings are being challenged to generate cost savings both for third-party payers and for oncology practices. Add to this the growing number of patients