𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Uncertainty and scoring systems

✍ Scribed by S. A. Ridley


Book ID
104456827
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
99 KB
Volume
57
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-2409

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Summary Estimating risks for individual patients facilitates communication with patients, relatives and colleagues, and determines whether further treatment is futile. The process of estimating risks involves mathematics (i.e. scoring systems) and human experience and expertise. Understanding how risks are estimated is important because prognostication is an integral part of any medical specialty. In the USA, such treatment limitation or withdrawal decisions were made on only 7% of all intensive care unit patients but this represented 47% of all deaths on such units. In the UK, data reported by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre suggest that although treatment limitation decisions are made on only 11.8% of patients, this accounts for over 50% of deaths on intensive care. Scoring systems offer a useful adjunct in identifying futility but there are important inherent weaknesses that limit their performance. This review aims to discuss some of these limitations.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Scoring systems
✍ M.S. Whiteley πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 91 KB
Scoring systems
✍ Alastair McGowan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 496 KB
Patient Scoring Systems
✍ P. Brady; W. Joyce πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 52 KB
Stroke scoring systems
✍ Maria Grazia Celani; Enrico Righetti; Rino Migliacci; Mauro Zampolini; Lucia Ant πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› The Lancet 🌐 English βš– 578 KB
Physiological scoring systems and audit
✍ P.M. Rothwell; RenΓ©W.S. Chang; DavidJ. Bihari; W. Hasibeder; M. Haisjackl; R. Ge πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› The Lancet 🌐 English βš– 468 KB