Unbiased Tests for Normal Order Restricted Hypotheses
โ Scribed by A. Cohen; J.H.B. Kemperman; H.B. Sackrowitz
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 516 KB
- Volume
- 46
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0047-259X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Consider the model where (X_{i j}, i=1, \ldots, k ; j=1,2, \ldots, n_{i}) are observed. Here (X_{i j}) are independent (N\left(\theta_{i}, \sigma^{2}\right)). Let (\boldsymbol{\theta}^{\prime}=\left(\theta_{1}, \ldots, \theta_{k}\right)) and let (A_{1}) be a ((k-m) \times k) matrix of rank ((k-m), 0 \leqslant m \leqslant k-1). The problem is to test (H: A_{1} \boldsymbol{\theta}=\mathbf{0}) vs (K-H) where (K: A, \boldsymbol{\theta} \geqslant \mathbf{0}). A wide variety of order restricted alternative problems are included in this formulation. Robertson, Wright, and Dykstra (1988) list many such problems.
We offer sufficient conditions for a test to be unbiased. For problems where (G^{-1}=\left(A_{1} A_{1}^{\prime}\right)^{-1} \geqslant 0) we do the following:
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper discusses a-admissibility and d-admissibility which are important concepts in studying the performance of statistical tests for composite hypotheses. A sufficient condition for (~-admissibility is presented. When --l/m, the Nomakuchi-Sakata test, which is uniformly more powerful than the
In some cone-restricted testing problems, it is known that the power function of the likelihood ratio test has a certain monotonicity property with respect to the direction of the alternatives. In this paper, we establish a unified result concerning such directional monotonicity by using an argument