✦ LIBER ✦

Ultraviolet sensitivity in hyperpolarizing photoreceptors of the giant clam Tridacna

✍ Scribed by Wilkens, Lon A.

Book ID: 109735640
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 1984
Tongue: English
Weight: 338 KB
Volume: 309
Category: Article
ISSN: 0028-0836
DOI: 10.1038/309446a0

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The defensive role of scutes in juvenile

The defensive role of scutes in juvenile fluted giant clams (Tridacna squamosa)

✍ Ling Han; Peter A. Todd; Loke Ming Chou; Yap Von Bing; Balasubramaniam Sivalogan 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 707 KB

Zooxanthellae release glucose in the tis

Zooxanthellae release glucose in the tissue of a giant clam, Tridacna crocea

✍ M. Ishikura; K. Adachi; T. Maruyama 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 981 KB

Morphological and functional characteriz

Morphological and functional characterization of hemocytes in the giant clam, Tridacna crocea

✍ Koji Nakayama; Ann M. Nomoto; Miyuki Nishijima; Tadashi Maruyama 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB

Atrophy of the Zooxanthellal Tubular Sys

Atrophy of the Zooxanthellal Tubular System in Bleached Giant Clams Tridacna gigas

✍ J.H. Norton; H.C. Prior; B. Baillie; D. Yellowlees 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 870 KB

Parasitism by a Protozoan in the Hemolym

Parasitism by a Protozoan in the Hemolymph of the Giant Clam,Tridacna crocea

✍ Koji Nakayama; Miyuki Nishijima; Tadashi Maruyama 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 174 KB

Genetic structure of giant clam (Tridacn

Genetic structure of giant clam (Tridacna derasa) populations from reefs in the Indo-Pacific

✍ J. M. Macaranas; C. A. Ablan; M. J. R. Pante; J. A. H. Benzie; S. T. Williams 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 778 KB

Large genetic differences were observed among the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Fiji and Philippine populations of Tridacna derasa (Roding) sampled in 1989 and 1990 (Nei's unbiased genetic distance, D, =0.137 to 0.341). This result contrasted strongly with the low genetic distance (D = 0.032) reported p