Two issues concerning the analysis of grouped data
β Scribed by S. Selvin
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 318 KB
- Volume
- 3
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0393-2990
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Simple statistical models are used to illustrate two important issues arising in the analysis of grouped data. The consequences are explored of grouping continuous data and analyzing the resulting contingency table. Specifically, an expression for the loss of porter is derived when and odds ratio is used to assess risk measured by a continuous variable. Also explored are the consequences of employing correlation and regression coefficients to analyze summary variables derived from grouped data (ecologic data). An expression is given that demonstrates the magnitude of a bias (ecologic fallacy) resulting from analyzing a specific type of grouped data.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Summry A Monte Carlo procedure is suggested for the problem of judging whether two sets of grouped circular data, possibly differently oriented, have arisen from otherwise equivalent dietributions. The procedure is applied to data relating to t h e months of onset of two illnesses in a group of
A computer prolgram for the regression analysis of survivalship is presented. It is written in PL/I language and intended for sitnatim~ when mine than one death may occur in a chosen period of observation. Using the program the relation of survivalship to β’ number of categorized explanatory variable
We study the loss of information (measured in terms of the Kullback Leibler distance) caused by observing ``grouped'' data (observing only a discretized version of a continuous random variable). We analyze the asymptotical behaviour of the loss of information as the partition becomes finer. In the c