## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The current systematic review and meta‐analysis compared monotherapy and combined androgen blockade in the treatment of men with advanced prostate carcinoma. Outcomes of interest included overall, cancer specific, and progression‐free survival; time to treatment failure;
✦ LIBER ✦
Twenty years of controversy surrounding combined androgen blockade for advanced prostate cancer
✍ Scribed by Judd W. Moul
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 71 KB
- Volume
- 115
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The current issue of Cancer includes a report on a concise, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with long‐term follow‐up that favors combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide versus lutenizing hormone‐releasing hormone monotherapy in Japanese men with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. It has been 20 years since the first RCT on CAB was published, and the debate continues.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Systematic review and meta-analysis of m
✍
David J. Samson; Jerome Seidenfeld; Brian Schmitt; Vic Hasselblad; Peter C. Albe
📂
Article
📅
2002
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 131 KB
👁 1 views
Combined androgen blockade with bicaluta
✍
Hideyuki Akaza; Shiro Hinotsu; Michiyuki Usami; Yoichi Arai; Hiroshi Kanetake; S
📂
Article
📅
2009
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 358 KB