𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Tumor thickness influences prognosis of T1 and T2 oral cavity cancer—but what thickness?

✍ Scribed by Christopher J. O'Brien; Christopher S. Lauer; Susanne Fredricks; Anthony R. Clifford; Edward B. McNeil; Jai S. Bagia; Christina Koulmandas


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
121 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background:

Previous studies have demonstrated that tumor thickness might influence prognosis in oral cancer, but the significant point at which outcome changes has varied from 1.5 mm to 6 mm. the clinical relevance of thickness remains unclear, and a reproducible prognostic "breakpoint" needs to be defined.

Methods:

Tumor thickness was measured in 145 oral cavity squamous cancers, clinically staged t1 (n = 62) or t2 (n = 83). clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively between 1988 and 2000, but thickness was measured on paraffin sections for this study. minimum follow-up was 2 years, and thickness was correlated with local control, cervical node involvement, and survival. patients with clinically positive nodes (n = 21) were not excluded. overall, 55 patients had pathologic node involvement at some time in their disease.

Results:

Median tumor thickness was 6.2 mm, and there was little variation between sites: tongue, 6.4 mm; floor of mouth, 6.6 mm; and other sites, 5.7 mm. median thickness for t1 tumors was 4.3 mm, significantly less than the t2 group, 8 mm (p <.01). median thickness also varied significantly for tumors with associated nodal disease (8.5 mm) and without nodal disease (5.8 mm) (p <.01). prognosis changed significantly at a cutoff of 4 mm with local control, nodal disease, and survival rates of 91%, 8%, and 100%, respectively, for tumors <4 mm compared with 84%, 48%, and 74% for those 4 mm or more thick (p <.01). subgrouping greater than and less than 3 mm and 5 mm also showed a difference but with poorer discrimination. thickness and pathologic nodal involvement were highly significant independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions:

Tumor thickness is a highly significant, objectively measurable prognostic factor in early stage oral cancers. there is a need to standardize techniques of measurement to allow a multi-institutional study to be carried out. this will facilitate the development of strategies aimed at improving the outcome of higher risk patients.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES