𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison

✍ Scribed by Ahmet Tefekli; Fatih Altunrende; Kadir Tepeler; Aytul Tas; Sabahattin Aydin; Ahmet Y. Muslumanoglu

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
188 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0301-1623

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Percutaneous treatment of focal vs. diff
Percutaneous treatment of focal vs. diffuse in-stent restenosis: A prospective randomized comparison of conventional therapies
✍ Michael Ragosta; Habib Samady; Lawrence W. Gimple; Ian J. Sarembock; Michael Fen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 71 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Few randomized studies compare outcomes for focal vs. diffuse in‐stent restenosis (ISR) using conventional treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) for focal vs. diffuse ISR using conventional techniques. One hundred thirteen

A randomized prospective trial of ioxagl
A randomized prospective trial of ioxaglate 320 (Hexabrix) vs. iodixanol 320 (Visipaque) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
✍ Andrew G.C. Sutton; Victoria J. Ashton; Philip G. Campbell; Dallas J.A. Price; J πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 63 KB

## Abstract We performed a randomized, prospective, double blind trial comparing the use of the ionic dimer contrast agent ioxaglate 320 (Hexabrix) with the nonionic dimer contrast agent iodixanol 320 (Visipaque) in 618 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable or unst