𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation

✍ Scribed by Douglas Ehring


Publisher
Oxford University Press
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Leaves
259
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Properties and objects are everywhere. We cannot take a step without walking into them; we cannot construct a theory in science without referring to them. Given their ubiquitous character, one might think that there would be a standard metaphysical account of properties and objects, but they remain a philosophical mystery. Douglas Ehring presents a defense of tropes--properties and relations understood as particulars--and of trope bundle theory as the best accounts of properties and objects, and advocates a specific brand of trope nominalism, Natural Class Trope Nominalism. This position rejects the existence of universals, and holds that the nature of each individual trope is determined by its membership in various natural classes of tropes (in contrast with the view that a trope's nature is logically prior to those class memberships). The first part of the book provides a general introduction and defense of tropes and trope bundle theory. Ehring demonstrates that there are tropes and indicates some of the things that tropes can do for us metaphysically, including helping to solve the problems of mental causation, while remaining neutral between different theories of tropes. In the second part he offers a more specific defense of Natural Class Trope Nominalism, and provides a full analysis of what a trope is.

✦ Table of Contents


Cover......Page 1
Contents......Page 8
Acknowledgments......Page 9
Introduction: Properties and concrete particulars......Page 10
Part I: Tropes......Page 26
1. Distinguishing particulars from universals......Page 28
2. Why believe in tropes?......Page 55
3. The individuation of tropes......Page 85
4. Bundle Theory......Page 107
5. Tropes and mental causation......Page 145
Part II: Natural Class Trope Nominalism......Page 182
6. Why Natural Class Tropes?......Page 184
7. The classic objections to Natural Class Trope Nominalism......Page 212
8. The determination objections......Page 236
Bibliography......Page 251
F......Page 256
O......Page 257
S......Page 258
Z......Page 259


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Causation and Causal Theories
✍ French P.A., Uehling, T.E., Jr., Wettstein H.K. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› University of Minnesota Press 🌐 English
Perception, causation, and objectivity
✍ Johannes Roessler; Hemdat Lerman; Naomi Eilan πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

''To be a 'commonsense realist' is to hold that perceptual experience is (in general) an immediate awareness of mind-independent objects, and a source of direct knowledge of what such objects are like. Over the past few centuries this view has faced formidable challenges from epistemology, metaphysi

Causation and Causal Theories 9
✍ French P.A., Uehling, T.E., Jr., Wettstein H.K. πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› University of Minnesota Press 🌐 English
Mental Causation and Ontology
✍ S. C. Gibb, E. J. Lowe, R. D. Ingthorsson πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2013 πŸ› Oxford University Press 🌐 English

An international team of contributors presents new work on the importance of ontology for a central debate in philosophy of mind. Mental causation has been a hotly disputed topic in recent years, with reductive and non-reductive physicalists vying with each other and with dualists over how to accomm

God and Mental Causation
✍ Daniel Lim (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2015 πŸ› Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 🌐 English

<p>This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debate

God and Mental Causation
✍ Lim, Daniel πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2015 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English

This book lies at the intersection of philosophy of mind and philosophy of religion and operates on the assumption that dialogue between the two disciplines can be fruitful. Β In particular it focuses on how debates in the philosophy of mind regarding the nature of mental causation relate to debates