๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [TiLSM]] Ontolinguistics (How Ontological Status Shapes the Linguistic Coding of Concepts) || Contents

โœ Scribed by Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar


Book ID
111651099
Publisher
Mouton de Gruyter
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
196 KB
Edition
1
Category
Article
ISBN
3110197790

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, the network of cross-connected conceptualizations the mind uses in coping with the world.

Assuming that language comparability is rooted in the comparability of user ontologies, the idea of the present volume is to further instigate progress in linguistics by looking behind the interface with the conceptual-intentional system and asking a still underexplored question: How are ontological structures reflected in intra- and cross-linguistic regularities? This question defines the research program of ontology based linguistics or ontolinguistics.

Recent advances in the theory of language have been characterized by an emphasis on external explanatory adequacy and thus on relating language to other phenomena. The research program introduced in this volume adds a decisively distinct and fresh aspect to this emerging new contextualization of the field by bringing together insights from different areas, mainly linguistics, but also neuroscience, philosophy, and artificial intelligence. In providing these disciplines with a new common task, the exploration of the impact of ontological structures on linguistic regularities, the ontolinguistic approach promises to develop into a vital branch of cognitive science.

Documenting the beginnings, the book aims to instigate future interdisciplinary research in this area. It will be of interest to researchers in linguistics, artificial intelligence, philosophy, and cognitive science in general.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 308 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 217 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 330 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 554 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 292 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t

[Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Mono
โœ Schalley, Andrea C.; Zaefferer, Dietmar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› Mouton de Gruyter ๐ŸŒ English โš– 643 KB

Current progress in linguistic theorizing is more and more informed by cross-linguistic (including cross-modal) investigation. Comparison of languages relies crucially on the concepts that can be coded with similar effort in all languages. These concepts are part of every language user's ontology, t