Survival models and cross-over designs both have an established place in biomedical research. Surprisingly, there are few examples of proper exploitation of the two in combination. A number of advantages and disadvantages of such studies are discussed. Two examples are used to illustrate the applica
Treatment–patient interactions for diagnostics of cross-over trials
✍ Scribed by J. K. Lindsey; B. Jones
- Book ID
- 101238003
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 96 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6715
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In cross-over trials, various types of responses may be recorded, not all of which can be appropriately modelled by a Normal distribution. Widening the class of models to the generalized linear model family has a number of advantages. An important one is that certain interactions, especially that between patients and treatments, can easily be fitted for frequency and count data. These can be used as diagnostics for the fit of the model used. One handicap has been the frequentist difficulty of comparing the fit of different non-nested models in this family. This can be overcome by the use of a model selection criterion such as the Akaike or Bayesian information criterion. This approach to modelling and diagnostics for cross-over trials is applied to two studies involving small counts of anginal attacks, previously analysed in the literature using classical Normal techniques.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract It remains uncertain whether bipolar disorder (BPD) patients in randomized‐controlled trials (RCTs) are sufficiently representative of clinically encountered patients as to guide clinical‐therapeutic practice. We complied inclusion/exclusion criteria by frequency from reports of 21 RCTs