Treatment decision-making in localized prostate cancer: why patients chose either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy
✍ Scribed by Andreas Ihrig; Monika Keller; Mechthild Hartmann; Jürgen Debus; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Boris Hadaschik; Markus Hohenfellner; Wolfgang Herzog; Johannes Huber
- Book ID
- 110923577
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 206 KB
- Volume
- 108
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1464-4096
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
or neoadjuvant hormonal or radiation therapy were excluded. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) and Schwartz Bayesian Criterion (SBC) estimates, which are com-1 Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard parative measures, were calculated for each clinical staging system. Pairwise com-Medical Scho
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, consensus is lacking regarding the relative long‐term efficacy of radical prostatectomy (RP) versus conventional‐dose external beam radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma. ## METHODS A
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. Estimates of prostate cancer‐specific mortality (PCSM) were determined after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT) in men with ≥1 high‐risk factors. ## METHODS. The study cohort comprised 948 men who underwent RP (N = 660) or RT (N = 288) for localized p