## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To investigate the feasibility of transoral robotic surgery as a method of surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. ## Study Design: Prospective case study. ## Methods: Forty‐five patients with previously untreated oropharyngeal squamou
Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal carcinoma and its impact on patient-reported quality of life and function
✍ Scribed by Fernando Danelon Leonhardt; Harry Quon; Marcio Abrahão; Bert W. O'Malley Jr; Gregory S. Weinstein
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 247 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background
The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma after transoral robotic surgery (TORS).
Methods
Short Form (SF)‐8 and Performance Status Scale (PSS) questionnaires were completed prior to surgery, 6 and 12 months of follow‐up.
Results
In all, 38 patients treated with TORS followed by adjuvant therapy as indicated were prospectively enrolled. For PSS Eating and Diet domains, significant decreases occurred at 6 months (p ≤ .001 and p ≤ .001, respectively) but not at 12 months. Significant declines in PSS Speech were seen at 6 and 12 months (p ≤ .001 and p ≤ .001). There were no significant declines in the SF‐8 domains, except for Bodily Pain and Global Health (6 months). Significantly higher PSS Eating and Diet scores were seen at 6 months for TORS alone compared with TORS and chemoradiation.
Conclusions
Combination TORS and adjuvant therapy caused a temporary decrease in several domains at 6 months, returning to baseline including swallowing function in all patients. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2012
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## BACKGROUND. The risk, severity, and patient‐reported outcomes of radiation‐induced mucositis among head and neck cancer patients were prospectively estimated. ## METHODS. A validated, patient‐reported questionnaire (OMDQ), the FACT quality of life (QOL), and the Functional Assessm