𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

Translation of letter addressed to a member of the Fire Risks Committee in reply to inquiries in connection with Rule 18 of the Committee's Rules

✍ Scribed by Joubert, J.

Book ID: 114460060
Publisher: Institution of Electrical Engineers
Year: 1883
Weight: 247 KB
Volume: 12
Category: Article
ISSN: 2054-0671
DOI: 10.1049/jste-3.1883.0024

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison between Sir George Shuckburgh

Comparison between Sir George Shuckburgh and Colonel Roy's Rules for the Measurement of Heights with the Barometer; In a Letter to Col. Roy, F. R. S. from Sir George Shuckburgh, Bart. F. R. S.

✍ Shuckburgh, G. 📂 Article 📅 1778 🏛 The Royal Society ⚖ 475 KB

Comparison between Sir George Shuckburgh

Comparison between Sir George Shuckburgh and Colonel Roy's Rules for the Measurement of Heights with the Barometer; In a Letter to Col. Roy, F. R. S. from Sir George Shuckburgh, Bart. F. R. S

✍ George Shuckburgh 📂 Article 📅 1778 🏛 The Royal Society ⚖ 791 KB

Preambles and resolutions relating to re

Preambles and resolutions relating to revision of U. S. copyright and patent laws**This draft was prepared by Dr. F. E. Stewart, chairman of the Committee on Patents and Trade-marks, A. Ph A., for Dr. S. Solis Cohen, Chairman of the Committee on Scope, U. S. P. IX. It was also submitted in the report of the Committee on Patents and Trade Marks, of the Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Association of Philadelphia, composed of Ernest T. Trigg (President Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce), Charles A. Wagner and Dr. F. E. Stewart, and approved. The matter in italics is suggested for revising the present U. S. Copyright and Patent Laws, and the subject is submitted for study by the members of the American Pharmaceutical Association, preparatory to its discussion at the next annual convention. The Committee received instructions at the last meeting to proceed with the revision, and the Chairman is desirous that the subject be carefully considered from every viewpoint.The Committee believes that all ambiguity now existing in the law should be removed in the revision. Provision should also be made in the law so that the inventor of a new process can secure a royalty from the original patentee. Attention is again directed that matter in italics embody the suggestions of the Committee for additions to the copyright, patent and trademark laws.—Editor.

📂 Article 📅 1917 🏛 Elsevier ⚖ 998 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to Michael Froehner's Letter to th

Reply to Michael Froehner's Letter to the Editor re: Firas Abdollah, Maxine Sun, Jan Schmitges, et al. Cancer-Specific and Other-Cause Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy Versus Observation in Patients with Prostate Cancer: Competing-Risks Analysis of a Large North American Population-Based Cohort. Eur Urol 2011;60:920–30

✍ Firas Abdollah; Maxine Sun; Francesco Montorsi; Pierre I. Karakiewicz 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB

Reply to Oliver W. Hakenberg and Chris P

Reply to Oliver W. Hakenberg and Chris Protzel's Letter to the Editor re: Niels M. Graafland, Joost A.P. Leijte, Renato A. Valdés Olmos, et al. Scanning with 18F-FDG-PET/CT for Detection of Pelvic Nodal Involvement in Inguinal Node-Positive Penile Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2009;56:339–45

✍ Niels M. Graafland; Simon Horenblas 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 62 KB

Reply to Dr Maffezzini's Letter to the E

Reply to Dr Maffezzini's Letter to the Editor re: Richard J. Sylvester, Adrian P.M. van der Meijden, Willem Oosterlinck, J. Alfred Witjes, Christian Bouffioux, Louis Denis and Donald W.W. Newling. Predicting Recurrence and Progression in Individual Patients with Stage Ta T1 Bladder Cancer Using EORTC Risk Tables: A Combined Analysis of 2596 Patients from Seven EORTC Trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466–77

✍ Richard J. Sylvester 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 53 KB